SHAZAM, biatch!
Jan. 10th, 2004 11:08 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Wow. Well.
I was listening to [Jacques Lu Cont]'s set from the Breezeblock 20/05/03 on MP3 when I decided that I really liked the first track.
I couldn't be arsed to google for the lyrics so I called SHAZAM.
Call 2850 when in a club, hold into the air and the call will automatically end for you. 9p/call and then you get a text back telling you what it was you were hearing/dancing to.
I put the phone near my speaker, the call ended and I got a text back saying
"SHAZAM tagged THE FAINT performing "The Conductor"."
I searched around on Soulseek and found the track. Downloaded the original but decided that it must've been a remix because this one was starting out really slow.
Sure enough, about three entries down on the search page was one entitled "Thin White Duke Jacques Lu Cont Remix"
Not only am I flabbergasted that SHAZAM found the track, but it's correct and at least I'm consistant because I liked a track by THE FEINT without prompting.
Goth.
I was listening to [Jacques Lu Cont]'s set from the Breezeblock 20/05/03 on MP3 when I decided that I really liked the first track.
I couldn't be arsed to google for the lyrics so I called SHAZAM.
Call 2850 when in a club, hold into the air and the call will automatically end for you. 9p/call and then you get a text back telling you what it was you were hearing/dancing to.
I put the phone near my speaker, the call ended and I got a text back saying
"SHAZAM tagged THE FAINT performing "The Conductor"."
I searched around on Soulseek and found the track. Downloaded the original but decided that it must've been a remix because this one was starting out really slow.
Sure enough, about three entries down on the search page was one entitled "Thin White Duke Jacques Lu Cont Remix"
Not only am I flabbergasted that SHAZAM found the track, but it's correct and at least I'm consistant because I liked a track by THE FEINT without prompting.
Goth.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-10 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-10 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-10 05:09 pm (UTC)The future is now.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-10 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-10 06:35 pm (UTC)I want something like that.. wow.. *sits down to contemplate the possibilities*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-11 04:51 pm (UTC)[the texts cost when it finds out what it is]
no subject
Date: 2004-01-10 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-11 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-11 06:29 am (UTC)Be warned though - it is not as cheap as you mention, if I recall correctly.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-11 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 04:45 am (UTC)i might give it a go in the future now.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 06:52 am (UTC)